RESOURCE · EU AI ACT MAPPING
This mapping shows where Mergetic capabilities can support operationalisation of Articles 9, 12, 14, 50 and 72. It does not certify compliance, replace legal analysis or decide whether the Act applies to a deployment.
THE CURRENT TIMELINE
Article 50 transparency duties generally began applying on 2 August 2026. A transition to 2 December 2026 applies to specific pre-existing systems covered by Article 50(2). Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 deferred the Chapter III high-risk requirements for Annex III systems to 2 December 2027 and Annex I systems to 2 August 2028. Article 72 was not included in those Chapter III deferrals. Applicability still depends on the system, role and facts.
Article 50
Capability: For configured outward-facing text workflows, a release-boundary check can verify that a required AI-transparency disclosure is present. Failure can require REGEN or prevent release pending review, and the disposition records whether the check passed.
Boundary: Text-output capability support only. Mergetic is not a synthetic-media marking or watermarking tool, and this is not a compliance determination.
Article 9
Capability: Runtime evaluation and active RulePack conditions can produce decision-level evidence of how agreed risk controls were applied before external effect.
Boundary: This does not determine whether the risk-management system is legally sufficient.
Article 12
Capability: The proposed action, evaluation, disposition and integrity events can be preserved as a linked, replayable record produced at decision time.
Boundary: Illustrative public records are not production certificates or prescribed legal logs.
Article 14
Capability: A separate governance authority can prevent release and route a blocked action to accountable human review at the agreed boundary.
Boundary: Workflow design, competence, authority and accountability remain deployment-specific responsibilities.
Article 72
Capability: Decision-time telemetry and linked records can support post-market monitoring evidence for systems to which Article 72 applies.
Boundary: The records do not, by themselves, constitute a complete post-market monitoring system, legal plan or compliance determination.
The AI Act's transparency phase is here—and the obligations financial-services boards already carry never waited for it. Supervisors from the Central Bank of Ireland to the PRA continue to expect accountable governance and evidence around AI and model risk.
PRIMARY SOURCES · THEN THE PROOF
The consolidated Regulation and the 2026 amendment are linked below, direct from EUR-Lex. Then run the demo and watch one governed decision produce the kind of decision-time evidence these articles describe.
